2001 |
|
What I stand for Michael Taylor, Liberal democrat Candidate Wednesday, June 6, 2001 As the campaign draws to a close I have been very heartened by the number of voters who have contagted me spontaneously to tell me they are voting Liberal Democrat for the first time - even people in their 70s. And curiously from both Labour and Conservative. However policies are what really matter, so a brief summary here. Calder Valley needs an MP who will stand up and fight for our area and, very importantly, speak out when government policy is against our interests.
If you, like me, think that these values are important, then trust that many others will too, and vote for me
It'll have to be Labour on June 7th Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge Tuesday, June 5, 2001 Firstly, thanks Craig for an interesting discussion. I found your summary of Hayek very useful. Josh Greenwood... I would have wished that tabloid thinking would not have characterised a vocal supporter of the local Green Party. Yes, The Times has supported Blair, but so has The Guardian. Thatcher herself has accused Blair of 'Socialism'. So, what's the truth? I think it's much more complicated and requires a much more balanced and thorough assessment than I've heard. The Liberal Democratic candidate sounds much more persuasive, but as usual it is from the position of total opportunism. . . Like many on this site, I have criticisms of New Labour. But in this constituency, where the only other alternative is a Tory, and where we have an MP who is prepared to defy the government whips, it is tantamount to voting for William Hague to vote for anyone other than Chris McCafferty.
Particularly if you vote Liberal Democrat,you are likely to let the Tories in. Times supports Tony Josh Greenwood Hebden Bridge Tuesday, June 5, 2001 The Times this morning encouraged readers to vote Labour as Tony Blair was doing a good job of carrying on what Margaret Thatcher started. That says it all! I'm voting Green. Europe Craig Whittaker Heptonstall Tuesday, June 5, 2001 In response to Jonathan: I have to agree with Jonathan that the EU has been a source of some positive legislation over the years. The Health & Safety issues with reference to Risk Assessments have added to the already superb standards of the British Health & Safety at Work acts that we have in place Standards that the British governments over the years have developed. Click here to read a full response by Craig to Jonathan's points on Europe Red Tape can mean social protection Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge Monday, June 4, 2001 In reponse to Craig: The EU has been the source of the most positive legislation in this country since 1992. The employment laws he disparages have introduced decent health and safety standards (vis risk assessments), and Labour's pro-European stance, opting into the social chapter, has given 1 million + p/t workers their first ever paid holidays. Labour's promise to extend maternity pay to 6 months also flows from the EU's enthusiasm to support women at work. It makes a material difference to the sort of British people our parliament treated with utter contempt under the Tories. You reap what you sow. This is part of a longer message from Jonathan Timbers. Click here to read the message in full. Star Wars Michael Taylor, Liberal democrat Candidate Monday, June 4, 2001 After speaking to Barbara Green yesterday I want to make my position on the NMD Star Wars programme cystal clear. I am totally opposed to this programme, which is a threat to world peace. In my view it will restart the arms race. I would use my vote as an MP to oppose the programme and would vote to deny the USA the right to deploy such a programme at its bases in the UK, such as Fylingdales here in Yorkshire. Michael Taylor has emailed us this morning details of his manifesto for this area - we have added this to his candidate's more info page of this site Refugees Simon Stewart Sunday, June 3, 2001 If Labour is going to be tougher on refugees that the Tories does that mean they are going to be building concentration camps to hold them and making them wear yellow stars. I will not voting on Thursday and until Labour returns to being a party of social justice, rather than one of social authoritarianism, not Labour ever again. The 1999 Immigration and Asylum Bill is an outrage, a total obscenity - Labour's Nuremberg Law. Europe Craig Whittaker Heptonstall Sunday, June 3, 2001 I read with interest and am pleased that both Jonathan and I agree that we need to be a part of the European Union. Where we seem to disagree, is to what extent the British involvement needs to be within that Union. Jonathon's Ideal would be to have the British way of life degenerate to an extent where we would have absolutely no control over our own destiny. No control over our, economy, taxation, autonomy, trading treaties, interest rates and indeed employment and laws.
We have seen how fair and equal the European Union can be, when it comes to supporting the British economy in times of need. (The disastrous ERM scenario is just one example of many). Unlike our Presidential style PM, who has in 4 short years, sold off over a quarter of this Nations Gold reserve and to what avail? To prop up the ailing Euro! Voting for radical policies Michael Taylor, Liberal democrat Candidate Todmorden Saturday, June 2, 2001 I have read with great interest the views being expressed on your website about the timidity of New Labour and the lack of radical policies. All the evidence on the doorsteps is that many many people throughout Calder Valley have similar misgivings and many of them are turning to the Liberal Democrats as the real alternative in Calder Valley. Many people are concerned about Public services - particularly transport services and the railways - and can see that it is only Liberal Democrats who are fighting to protect these services and to put in investment paid for out of taxation. The future for public services under the Tories is none and the New Labour hostility to public provision grows by the day. As a local councillor I know only too well what is happening to public services - they are being privatised by stealth and this will accelerate in a Labour second term. Those concerned to secure public services have really only one choice in this election and that is the Liberal Democrats. On Green issues, our manifesto has Green Action on every page, relating to all our policies and with a coomon thread of protecting our planet and its environment. Do look at our national website on www.libdems.org.uk for further information.
There is little evidence of the Tories doing well in Calder Valley and nationally they are in total disarray, just waiting for the elction to be over so they can indulge in internal party bloodletting and a leadership contest. I believe there is no chance of the Tory winning here so people can vote for the candidate of their choice without fear. For a real radical alternative to New Labour that must be the Liberal Democrats. Greens and Politics Tim Swift Halifax Saturday, June 2, 2001 I was concerned to see Alison Dale, Josh Greenwood and others toying with voting Green because they think Labour's environmental policies are not moving far enough or fast enough. They may be open to criticism, but they are streets ahead of anything we would see if William Hagues' Tories came within a whiff of power - just look at how they are pandering to the motoring lobby nationally and locally. (According to the Tory candidate, it would seem that you cannot live in the Upper Valley without a car)
Remember that in America, Ralph Nader stood to "ginger up" the Democrats on the environment. The direct result was the election of George W Bush and the repudiation of Kyoto. Don't risk the same happening here - stick with Labour and keep up the pressure for them to deliver on their environmental promises in the next term. Green issues Anne Handley Mytholmroyd Saturday, June 2, 2001 There seems a lot of support locally for green issues, but not much support for the Green Party. Like Jonathon Timbers and a lot of other people, I agree with some (in my case most) of their policies, but feel I'm not in tune with everything the candidate stands for. I eat meat, though I would want to change current practices so that animals did not suffer unnecessarily in its production. In fact, I would wish to change a lot of agricultural and commercial practices, not just in this country, and not just by refusing to eat certain foods. On the whole I think the Green Party have many of the right policies for going about this. But they seem to be alienating a lot of folk that share the same long term goals and, frankly, are unlikely to vote for them. It seems to me that, of the three 'major' parties, the Liberal Democrats have the 'next best' policy on environmental issues, particularly with respect to local production, public transport and energy. But I would like to hear what the other candidates would do, specifically in the Calder Valley, in terms of protecting the environment and saving and producing energy from natural resources. The Prime Minister Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge Friday, June 1, 2001 The European debate is about balancing free trade with democratic, transparent institutions in a way which retains Member State autonomy, hence the resistance to a fully democratic supreme European Parliament (where majority voting on all issues would carry the day). What Craig is talking about is business without democracy - authoritarian Capitalism. Overwhelmingly, this general election has pointed to the dissatisfaction that the culturally and ethnically diverse British population have with this system, which removes power from them, from Parliament and even from the Executive and places it not in Brussels (if only it were so simple), but in the hands of business corporations and private finance. This is part of a longer message from Jonathan Timbers. Click here to read the message in full. Tories on the Net Sir Geoffrey Hebden Bridge (the posh end) Wednesday, May 30, 2001 Whenever we can persuade my grandson Tarquin to switch this damn computer on, my good lady wife and I are following with interest what passes for rational debate on this Hebden Bridge website thingamajig. In reply to some of the loony left respondents, I am proud to say that there are still a few of us left with standards of decency, for whom the sobriquet rabid Tory is still a badge of honour, and not just a term of personal abuse. Be in no doubt whatsoever: the Conservative Party is standing firm behind William Hague. This is a man of vision and integrity, who will be out on his ear as soon as the election is over. The foot and mouth epidemic has been a disaster for this government. I have many friends amongst the landed gentry, who have been hit very hard. To see their sheep and cattle slaughtered is like the death of a much-loved family member... albeit a much-loved family member who would have been sent to the abattoir in a few weeks.
Its a ill wind, they say. And, thankfully, the epidemic is keeping the woolly-hatted rambling riff-raff off our land. Yes, Woody Guthrie was right: its not your land... its OUR land, and don't you forget it. So bugger off sharpish, before I set the dogs on you. Right, where was I? Oh yes. Vote Tory on June 7th. Like me, and any of my staff who still want a job on June 8th. Europe Craig Whittaker Heptonstall Wednesday, May 30, 2001 I read with interest Jonathan Timbers comments about the Conservative Party having..'backward-looking anti-European views'. Being in Europe, but not ruled by Europe seems to me to be a pretty basic ideal that will safeguard our way of life and allow us to control our own soverenty, economy and most importantly our own destiny. A Federalist Super Sate, which in effect is what the German & French Governments would have Europe Run like, with control of all Europe being dominated by the powerful few countries in that state. This Ideal is not what the British people voted for when we joined Europe and I bet this is not what the British people want today. Their is nothing anti-European about wanting to stay within Europe and use the system as a trading system, which it was initailly set up as and wanting to make Europe a better place for us all, but integration on the level of a Federalist State is entirely a different issue. There is not to date a Federalist system that has worked on the scale that Europe is heading towards - Yes you could mention America (US) and of course Australia, but the big differene is the fact that the Americans and Australian systems works within the boundaries of their own people. They have very little cultural differences; The states do not go to war with each other and there are no issues with boundaries and borders. We have all these issues within Europe, where in some cases the cultural differences are so ingrained into their societies and beliefs, that trust and harmony will always be an issue. We still see wars within Europe and on it's borders because of boundry and border issues - Issues that have been around for not just a few years, but in some cases Centuries. Issues that can't even be sorted within some countries between their own people. Now I don't for one minute think that this should be left alone and we should 'Dump' the EEC and withdraw, quite the oposite, we should stay within the EEC as a trading country and also harmonise some legislation etc to make it easier to trade and each of us enjoy the benefits of each others countries BUT joining the Euro and becoming part of Tax harmonisation (and YES contrary to what President Blair would have us believe, this is the aim of our German & French neighbours, they have admitted as much this week)is a step too far - We shouldn't ditch our own currency and lose control of our own tax, inflation and most importantly our own destiny ! We should be IN Europe but NOT Ruled by Europe !! The Prime Minister Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge Tuesday, May 29, 2001 Point of information in response to Alison: under Labour, the cabinet, including the PM, have only accepted 2/3rds of their allowance - which is a lot more than the rest of us, but at least it's a gesture in the right direction.
I don't think the character of the PM is relevant, frankly, to voting. If I voted on the basis of who I liked the best, it would be the Tories if they were lead by Ken Clarke (even tho' he was a terrible education secretary) because he makes me laugh.
Tories on the Net? Reading the messages so far, it would seem that the Calder Valley Conservatives have yet to catch on to the new technology. Where are they? Chris Campbell Todmorden Monday, May 28, 2001 Doubts about Labour Alison Dale Hebden Bridge Monday, May 28, 2001 I have serious misgivings about voting Labour because I really wonder what sort of a world our Prime Minister lives in. It certainly seems far removed from ours here in the Calder Valley. In a recent Daily Telegraph article Tony Blair, talking to a group of sixth formers complained about about not having any money.İİHe İtalked about giving up politics so that he could 'make some money.' This from a man who earns around £100,000 a year which admittedly is chicken feed in comparison to his wife's enormous earnings as a barrister in high profile and high earning cases. How can he make statements like these when there are so many people receiving the minimum wage which is far below £5 an hour? A Party or a Way of Life? Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge Saturday, May 26, 2001 Steve, whilst I respect your commitment, I can't help feeling that it sounds more like religious devotion. What about us poor meat-eating sinners who smoke and drink, are we really the right sort of people to vote Green? I don't own a car, use public transport, occasionally buy stuff which says 'Fair Trade' on it, but I still feel too unworthy to vote Green. Incidentally, would anybody like to kick off about Europe? There must be some rabid Tories out there who want to amuse the rest of us with some stuff they made up about British history and tradition. From the Green Candidate Steve Hutton Green Party Candidate Hebden Bridge Thursday, May 24, 2001 The site is proving to be a well used resource and prompting valuable comments. I am sorry that the policies and biography I outlined have failed to impress Mr. Timbers and Ms Dale. The latter can find the entire Green Party manifesto on the GP web site where she will find abundant details about everything she wishes to know from transport to citizens income, all this can be found under "policies" With the lingering foot and mouth epidemic still fresh in the national conscious I chose to focus on the matter of agriculture for my column in the HB Times. This was a matter of relevance rather than wishing to project the image of a one-issue party concerned (in this case) only with animals and the environment. Mr. Timbers clearly feels the Friends of the Earth ought to be left to debate food production and I have every confidence in their policies on this matter. However you cannot vote for the FoE at a general election and this is why The Green Party seeks to promote & conglomerate the ideals of social, human, animal and environmental issues within one political party.
My reasons for going vegan were not for simply for its own sake, its conscious move away from a whole area of unethical practices that are detrimental to people, the environment and the animals that dwell in it. Globalization means that now there is no one issue that exists in isolation, social issues feed and influence one another. Taking steps to change ones lifestyle in turn effects all those whom are involved in these complex chains. I choose not to buy products produced using child labor nor do I save my money with institutions that may fund armament manufacturers, nobody would describe these issues as being merely about shopping and saving, yet that is how they manifest themselves in our day to day consumer lifestyles. In turn veganism allows me to disassociate myself from de-forestation, land theft from indigenous people for ranching, the over use of anti-biotics in cattle, as well as agrochemicals and land lost to grow grain to feed to cattle and the methane produced which elevates global warming. Nothing exists in isolation, neither is it a case of favoring one creature over another. Red (well, pink) v Green Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge Wednesday, May 23, 2001 I agree with Alison. The statement by the Green Party candidate in the HB Times only talked about local food networks. Surely, this sort of thing is better done by Friends of the Earth, who have a lot of pertinent points to make to all the political parties and come up with pragmatic suggestions for them. What Josh says indicates that voting Green is more of a tactical move to get the main political parties to put environmental issues higher up the agenda, rather than providing an alternative to them. Since the Green Party would, in a PR system, be my most likely second choice, I find this deeply disappointing. Labour remains my first choice. Furthermore, in a marginal constituency, which may go Tory on June 7th, doing anything else but vote Labour will only increase the strength of the Conservative Party - with their promise of massive cuts in health and education, and backward-looking anti-European views. However, I can understand Alison's dilemma as a teacher. Frankly, I don't know if Labour will decrease the burden on classroom teachers, but I do know that since coming to power the primary schools locally have improved significantly, and money has been made available to Old Town and Calder High for structural improvements which had been left pending for years under the Tories. The manifesto, which I bought today, says it will 'build on the findings'(sic) of a review about teacher workload, and commits the government to recruiting more teachers, more NTA's and offering PRP and retention packages. As an ex-teacher, I think the best thing it could do is get rid of SATS and trust teachers to assess their pupils and have more autonomy over the development of their own curriculum. Nobody seems to mention fun or the scope for creativity in teaching anymore (because there isn't any). There should be less bureaucracy, less management and more teaching. That would also mean better value for money. But then again, I'm just an old leftie. On top of that, there are quite a few teachers who wouldn't appreciate being sent back to the classroom full-time again. Nevertheless, Labour does seem to me to offer the best alternative in the Calder Valley. Especially since I've read on this site that Chris has taken a stand against Bush's Son of Star Wars system. We have a good, centre-left MP. She needs your support. If we lose her, Blair loses a critic on the left, to be replaced by a critic on the far-Right. What are Green policies? Alison Dale Hebden Bridge Tuesday, May 22, 2001 Until I saw the Green Party candidate's biography/personal statement on this site I was seriously thinking about voting Green in the election. The first thing he mentions is that he's a vegan. Do we really need to know about his eating habits? Then follows a list of all the animal rights activities he is involved in. This gives the impression that here is someone who cares more about animals than he does about people. With such an emphasis one wonders if elected he'd be suggesting that we give animals the vote. Even after visiting the Green Party's website I don't feel as if I know what their policies are. It contains many statements about what they're concerned about but nothing about what they would actually do if they were elected. It is not a site which would inspire anyone to vote for them. So, here I am still undecided - a first for me at election time. I'd like to know what the Greens would do on income tax, transport, education, housing and the health service. Surely they must have some ideas or else why are they standing? Facts about Redistribution Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge Sunday, May 20, 2001 Some facts for Josh from 'The Financial Times' re. distribution of wealth and the Labour Government: The poorest 10% are 9% better off than in 1997. This has been the result of initiatives like the 10% tax bracket, Working Family Tax Credit, the Minimum Wage. On top of that somewhere in excess of 1 million workers this year are getting their first ever paid holidays as a result of the Fairness at Work Act 1999. Independent commentators point out that the boom in the economy will inevitably increase inequality because the rich get richer at a faster rate than the poor get richer. There's nothing much any government can do about that. Despite the fact that in reality, as Labour found to its cost in 1992, most voters will not countenance even modest rises in income tax, it has tried to restore a measure of progressive taxation through the 10% tax bracket. There have been enormous strides under Labour for the very poorest who don't have access to web discussion forums, and don't get their voices heard. Labour is prioritising those people, and if some of the commentators on this forum are not aware of this, then may I humbly suggest that that may be because they do not have much contact with the mass of socially excluded people who suffered such vicious attackes under Thatcher and Major. Please let's not go back to that.
However, giving Labour their due, does not mean uncritically supporting the government. In fact, to develop a critique, can I suggest, it is necessary to take a balanced view so we can get at the root of the limitations to their policy, and their, at times, mistaken philosophy. I take what Josh says about the environment, though Kyoto (for all its faults) and the partial debt cancellation as well as the quiet but massive rise in overseas development aid do indicate that Labour has some achievements which should be supported and encouraged. The problem as far as I am concerned, and I know that Ken Livingstone has also identified this as a fundamental issue, are public private partnerships for developing the public sector. I'd take The Green Party a lot more seriously if it showed more clear thinking on issues like this, and showed more understanding of the conflict between participating in the electoral process and developing a mass, broad-based movement. One only has to see it sharing power in Germany to see how it simply repeats the pattern in government of large Western European social democratic parties, though no doubt it has achieved some useful reforms. A Wasted Vote? Josh Greenwood Hebden Bridge Saturday, May 19, 2001 I voted Labour last time in the hope that they would help bring about a more just society and take steps to save this planet from environmental destruction. They have failed. They did almost nothing for the environment and the rich got even richer, while the poor got ever worse off. Now that George Bush wants to resurrect the Cold War they seem so keen to give him all the help he will need, including Menwith Hill. So do I vote Green this time? They at least have many of the policies I believe in, both social and environmental. Or would this be a wasted vote as the introduction to this page suggests? I am inclined to think that if we give the Green Party enough votes, the other parties may start taking the environment more seriously. They may wake up to the fact that there really are votes in green issues. If its not too late. Where's the Posters? "Floating Voter" Hebden Bridge Thursday, May 17, 2001 The talk is all of voter apathy, but what about candidate apathy? Where are all the signs that there's an election pending? Where are all the colourful posters in windows and beside the road? The Tories have made a start but the town's looking a bit monochrome so far. Where are the endless streams of leaflets, and the doorstep canvassers? Elections are no fun any more. Values Mike Shillabeer Todmorden Wednesday, May 16, 2001 I have sympathy with the views expressed by the green party candidate, I don't believe that the growth economy is the answer to our ills either, it is the ruin of many and only benefits the few. However, if we accept that tactical voting is necessary to get the government most likely to support a vision for a better world and better country, surely new labour, for all their faults, are the safest bet. Good old Gordon at least looks after our money and attempts to put it to good use. Why are people still seduced by Tory promises of lower taxation when it's investment in our infrastructure that will create a fairer and sounder society for this and future generations. Why are the tories so obsessed with keeping the pound as well? It's because they still think we're all small minded and selfish with little ability to think creatively. Hague and his cronies insult us with their values and their patronising attitudes. Let's hope they are finally crushed and condemmed to history (the nineteenth century is where they belong). A new order is needed, not a new government. From the Green Candidate Steve Hutton Hebden Bridge Wednesday, May 16, 2001 What issues concern people locally in Calderdale? Maybe a decent transport system instead of the vacuum we have at present, the effects of intensive agricultures twisted logic of slaughtering thousands of animals thanks to the governments obsession with an economic dogma thats as ruthless as the mass culling. What other matters raise the blood pressure in Calderdale? Why are we suffering regular & severe flooding and what proposals are put forward to combat it? The main parties would have us believe that to dig ourselves out of the hole of climate change we need even more economic expansion. Or is that the voice of their masters the World Trade Organization? While governments are becoming increasingly afraid of the WTO the barriers to more consumption will be steadily eroded. Workers rights, animal rights and protecting the environment are all dead wood to the WTO and ultimately their foot soldiers; politicians. Votes for the main parties are votes in the pocket of the multinationals, increasing their grip on world governments. Do you want your decisions made by politicians on behalf of big business or would you yourselves like to have a say what affects you? A Green vote will bring decision-making home to where it matters; with you. Chris McCafferty David Elliott Hebden Bridge Monday, May 14, 2001 I'm sure that our MP, Chris McCafferty, has done some laudable things during her time as an MP for the world at large. However, I'd be happy for someone to point out to me what she has actually done for her constituency. Since her election in '97 I've been rather concerned that she has proved to be such a low-profile politician unless a suitable photo-opportunity has arisen. This concern has been rather compounded by her decision to limit surgeries locally and her apparent reluctance to vote on a number of important matters in the Commons. I have to admit that my unease with Ms McCafferty does stem from the fact that she is of New Labour whose own fore-lock tugging MPs have allowed the party leaders to do what they wished in terms of the continuation of vile policies initiated by their predecessors (for example, think of education, immigration, asylum seekers and, you have to laugh, 'ethical' foreign policy). There are some honourable exceptions, Alice Mahon being one, but not, alas, Ms McCafferty.
The problem for many, such as myself, is that we are not yet convinced by Chris McCafferty's suitability as our representative in the Commons. The other Parties make little appeal, either because of odious Little Englanderism or because they fall short of being realistic alternatives. However, Labour's Politbureau has already decided as to who should best represent us. There is still time for us to be convinced, Ms McCafferty, but not much!
Underspending Alison Dale Hebden Bridge Sunday, May 13, 2001 The problem isnt that the Labour Party is spending too much, rather that it is spending too little and not even attempting a minor redistribution of wealth that so many of us hoped for when they were elected four years ago. When I first went to work income tax was 33 pence in the pound. This did not feel excessive. Although people as they will always do complained then but education, health and social services provision was far better than it is today. In the last six months my partner and I have paid out nearly £1000 for dental treatment, an amount which would have been far lower if it had still been available on the NHS. I worked in old peoples homes where the residents were not forced to sell off their houses to meet the costs of their care. People who were at home recovering from serious operations were able to get home helps. Those who were unemployed received earnings related benefit for around a year after theyd lost their jobs. The interest on mortgages was paid in full. Far fewer people in those days lost their homes when they lost their jobs. If you saw beggars on the streets it meant you were visiting another country, not that you were in one of Britains major cities. Direct income tax is the fairest form of taxation as its based on what people earn. I know that there are many people like me who are most willing to pay more income tax if services were restored to the levels they were at twenty five years ago. Its all too easy to blame "scroungers" and focus on minor matters like the costs of road signs than to reflect more broadly on the issues underlying the injustices we see all around us. Overspending Jenny Mytholmroyd Sunday, May 13, 2001 It seems to me that the main aim of New Labour is to spend as much of our money as they possible can. This country has gone mad! If only we were allowed to keep some of the money we earned we would be in a position to spend it on what we wanted and would not need to have a Nanny State, taking our money off us and giving a little bit back as pocket money. Under New Labour all my income from 1st January until 17th June goes in taxes. I have had enough. I have three children to look after, never take a penny from the state, and I simply cannot afford to live here any more. When I look at how much of MY money is spent, I despair! All those scroungers in Mytholmroyd and Hebden Bridge, claiming every benefit going and working for cash in hand and then look at the new streetlamps in Hebden Bridge. OK they may be needed, but why not re-use the old road signs? They are in perfect condition, but oh no the taxpayer can buy new ones they do not want, do not need and cannot afford!
If President Blair is re-elected, I am moving abroad with my family. From the Lib-Dem candidate Councillor Michael Taylor Todmorden, Saturday, May 12, 2001 As the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary candidate for Calder Valley I welcome comments and ideas from anyone. Please contact me by phone 01706 839413 or 07979 954349 or email me. The Lib Dems also have a website, which will be updated regularly throughout the campaign. Foot and Mouth Eileen Burnip Hebden Bridge, Friday, May 11, 2001 Please note the following news release (May 11). Perhaps we should invite Michael Meacher here to help persuade those concerned that footpaths can now be opened.
Officials from both Maff and the Department of the Environment would examine decisions made by Cumbrian councils. The move follows fears that access to the Lake District remains shut off despite success in tackling the foot and mouth crisis. Meanwhile, tourism businesses continue to suffer devastating losses as visitors stay away from the county. At an emergency meeting at Westminster last night, Workington MP Dale Campbell-Savours and Westmorland and Lonsdale MP Tim Collins urged Mr Meacher to intervene." Underspending I am a Parish Councillor in Heptonstall, who despairs at the poor levels of funding for Services on a local level - Take the current closing of 23 local toilets in the valley, where I feel these type of services are the 'Basics' of our life. I could go on and on - Librarys, school funding etc. etc I know these are directly related to the management of the local CMBC, however, we see these types of facilities in our communities becoming less and less. What are each of the main parties proposing to do on a National level to ensure that the monies needed to fund 'Basic' community needs, actually gets to these needs eg: where the Government is more and more giving monies directly to school, hence bypassing LEAs Craig Whittaker Hebden Bridge, Thursday, May 10, 2001 I think it's important to make two basic points about why it is vital to vote Labour on June 7th. Firstly, although New Labour is not going to confront Capitalism (partly because no elected government can, and survive, and partly because our electorate generally do not want increases in taxation and are conservative with a small 'c'), it has achieved more than any other reforming government this century with the exception of the 1945 - 51 Labour government, and arguably the Liberals in the first decade of the last century. The Financial Times commented, at the time of the last budget, that the very poorest 10% had seen an increase of 9% in real terms under New Labour. Add that to the right to recognition for Trade Unions, the Minimum wage, devolution for Scotland and Wales, Working Familty Tax Credit (the list can go on and on) and we have substantial reasons to vote Labour. In the next term, Labour is committed to pushing for the abolition of child poverty and full employment. It may not be everthing an old Socialist like me wants, but then again no Labour government has ever been committed to a Socialist programme, and it falls well within my range of reasonable expectations for a reformist social democratic party, post Thatcher. Secondly, our MP, Chris McCafferty, has a good record of defying the Labour whip over some of the attacks on parts of the welfare system which the party has regrettably launched. If you don't like New Labour, or are highly critical of parts of their programme from the Left, or as a teacher etc, then it would be to shoot yourself in the foot if you did not vote Labour in Calder Valley. We need independent voices in the parliamentary party. Also, there is Chris's work on female genital mutilation, which has earned her plaudits from the UN. She was also instrumental in getting Gordon Brown to reduce VAT on female sanitary products to 5%. Chris continues to fight for people, both in her constituency, nationally and in the world. Vote Labour, and don't let that other shower in. Jonathan Timbers Hebden Bridge, Thursday, May 10, 2001 Just looked at the 1997 page and saw my name. I asked if any of the candidates knew what the Internet was! Fast changing times! I shall watch with interest which candidates make use of this page this time round. Chris Campbell Todmorden Thursday, May 10, 2001 I'm a student from Sowerby, 2nd year. Never been in debt before being a student. Seriously thinking of giving up and earning some money. Don't know if I'm going to vote, but I might if I thought any of them would make a difference for students. Emily Norwich Thursday, May 10, 2001 Well done for doing this page. Here's my question. There is great concern in the teaching profession about the large increase in administrative tasks which teachers now have to perform. Could the candidates give voters a detailed account of how their party propose to reduce this burden on teachers? Alison Dale Hebden Bridge Wednesday, May 9, 2001 |